Concerning Dholgyal with reference to the views of past masters and other related matters
A talk on Dholgyal by H.H. the Dalai Lama during the course of religious teachings in Dharamsala, October 1997
There may be many among you who have never been involved in the
practice of Dholgyal at all. In many other cases, you may have
practised it in the past, but have later given it up. With the hope of
strengthening your sense of conviction about this, I have brought here
some statements made by lamas in the past. I am going to read them out
to you.
In the letters and statements that they have recently distributed,
proponents of Dholgyal (also known as Shugden) assert that this issue
should be understood on two levels - on an interpretable level and on a
definitive level. They say, for instance, that even the Fifth Dalai
Lama (1617-1682) composed a prayer for assistance (‘prin’ chol)
addressed to Dholgyal. Of course, it is difficult for us to prove
convincingly whether it belongs to the Fifth Dalai Lama or not.
The Collected Works of the Fifth Dalai Lama are classified into three
sections: the five outer volumes, the twenty-five inner volumes, the
secret or Kagyama volumes, which consist of the Extensive Secret
Visions or Sangwa Gyachen. Previously, this last volume existed only in
handwritten form, not in a printed edition. However, eventually it has
been published in print.
There are outer, inner and secret sections to the Fifth Dalai Lama’s
works, but among them you will not find a single ‘prayer for
assistance’ addressed to Dholgyal written by the Fifth Dalai Lama.
However, let us allow for the possibility that there are some texts by
the Fifth Dalai Lama which escaped the notice of the compilers.
Regarding the Fifth Dalai Lama’s open statement about Dholgyal, folio
157 (front and back) of the autobiography of the Fifth Dalai Lama
called Dukulai Gosang, Volume Kha, Lhasa edition, says:
It is well known that at Dol Chumig Karmo (Dol Chumig Karmo is
Shugden’s place of origin, where a shrine was constructed to him. He is
also referred to as Dholgyal because he is a Gyalpo from Dol Chumig
Karmo. Gyalpo is a class of interfering spirit. Since Shugden belong to
this group, he is also called Gyalchen, the great Gyalpo.) A very
powerful perfidious spirit (darn sri, the spirit of one who has
deliberately breached his oath or commitment to his lama out of
resentment and dissension), born due to distorted prayers, has been
harming the teaching of the Buddha and sentient beings in general and
in particular. The harmful activity has intensified since the fire-bird
(year), 1657, and (the spirit) has been successful in many of his
missions. But, as if this did not concern them, hardly anyone has taken
any action. At the end of the earth-bird (year), 1669, a new house was
constructed at Dol Chumig Karmo and articles were placed there in the
hope that it would become a place for the Gyalpo to settle.
(H.H. - So, it appears that attempts were made in the beginning to appease it by peaceful means.)
However, his harmful activities only intensified and recently many lay
and ordained people have been afflicted with diseases and several monks
have died. Therefore, all the monks unanimously decided that a fire
ritual should be performed.
Consequently, two groups of practitioners were organised. One was led
by Nagrampa Dhondup Gyatso, who acted as the Vajra Acharya of (a
performance of) the Dorje Drolo ritual and the other was led by
Nangjung Ngagchang Losang Khyentse, who acted as the Vajra Acharya of
(a performance of the) Yangsang Karma Dragpo ritual. Likewise Rigzin
Pema Thinley of Dorje Drag, Dharma King Terdag Lingpa, Vugja Lungpa,
Drigung Tulku Rinpoche, Katshal Zurpa Ngari Kunchok Lhundup and Palri
Tulku performed the Wrathful Lama, Yama, Phurba, Loktri practice for
seven days, at the conclusion of which a fire ritual was performed,
during which the ‘perfidious spirit’ and his entourage were burnt.
Everybody was convinced (of its success because of) the wonderful signs
that appeared and the smell of burning flesh that they all witnessed.
Thus, many sentient beings were explicitly granted the gift of
fearlessness, because their lives were saved. And indirectly these
creatures (‘byungpo means creature or evil spirit) were delivered to
the peaceful state of being, released from having to experience the
intolerable suffering of bad states of rebirth due to their
increasingly negative actions.
At that time a declaration (zur dpang, refers to the testimony or
deposition of a witness) was issued to indicate that these creatures or
evil spirits were without protection and refuge. (Consequently), the
Dardhingpas of Dorje Drag Monastery compiled mantras. As a religious
practice for the deceased, Sera and Drepung Monasteries performed the
Prayer of the White Umbrella Deity 44,000 times and recited the Heart
Sutra 118,000 times during eleven sessions during which tea was offered
in each monastery. As an offering for the recitations, gold coins equal
to the value of two Ithals (about 27 kgs) of wheat were given to each
monk. At sixty-seven other well- disciplined monasteries in the
neighbourhood, tea and gold coins to the value of one Itha] (about 13.5
kgs) of wheat were offered to each monk with a request that they
perform the White Umbrella Prayer as many times as possible for the
deceased. At Yerpa, the Gyuto monks performed the prayer of appeasement
of Gonpo (Mahakala) and Choegyal (Dharmaraja) 693 times, Tenma
1,121,800 times, and the Sixty Section Ritual Cake Offering to Overcome
Evil (Drug chu pa’i gTor dog). At Choekhor Gyal they performed rituals
to (Palden Lhamo) Magzorma, to Mahakala the Lord of the Tent (Gur and
Zhal), and to Begtse and at Gatshal they performed the prayer for
appeasing the Dharma protectors in general, 10,000 times and the
prayers of the Six Armed (Mahakala), ?Leshin and Vaishravana (rNam sre)
1000 times. At 11 district capitals they performed the Prayer for
Invoking the Spirit of the Deity to Vanquish the Enemy
(dgra-lha-dpangs-bstod) and other practices to appease local deities
and spirits.
So, the number and types of prayers that were performed are listed. It
is also mentioned that when the exorcism was performed the Fifth Dalai
Lama himself issued a declaration (zur dpang) calling on the assembly
of Dharma protectors to be just witnesses to the exorcism of this
forsaken spirit. This is what appears in the Dukulai Goesang.
Regarding the declaration which was written at that time, below is a
translation of the testimony that the fifth Dalai Lama mentions in his
autobiography. The original Tibetan can be found on page 148 front and
back (English pages 423 and 424) of the volume Da of his Collected
Works published in Gangtok, Sikkim.
“Because of the clever manipulations of Lak Ahgyal of Gekhasa, the
false reincarnation of Tulku Sonam Geleg Palzang (Tulku Dakpa Gyaltsen)
was successful (in being recognised as the reincarnation). But because
of distorted prayers he became a perfidious spirit (dam Sri) and
brought serious harm to sentient-beings.
[H.H.- Gekhasa was the location of Tulku Drakpa Gyaltsen’s (1617-56)
birthplace. Lak Ahgyal was the name of Tulku Drakpa Gyaltsen’s mother.
She seems to have been a very capable women. To begin with there had
even been a rumour that her son was the reincarnation of Gyalwa Yonten
Gyatso (the Fourth Dalai Lama). Gekhasa is probably in Toelung.
Therefore, the text says, “because Lak Ahgyal was so clever and skilful
the false reincarnation of Tulku Sonam Geleg Palzang was successful”.
Tulku Sonam Gelek Palsang was the reincarnation of Dho-Ngag Rabjam
M’awa Panchen Sonam Drakpa (1478-1554). Then, because of Ahgyal’s
skilful manipulation Tulku Drakpa Gyaltsen came to be known as the
reincarnation of Gelek Palsang. However, this text states that he was
indeed a mistaken and false reincarnation. When the text says “he was
successful” it means that even though he was the false reincarnation,
he succeeded in maintaining his position as the real incarnation. Then
it says,]
But because of distorted prayers he became a perfidious spirit (dam
sri) and brought serious harm to sentient beings. Therefore, a total of
seven groups of practitioners led by (Pema Trinley) Rinpoche of Dorje
Drag, Choegyal Terdag Lingpa, Choeje Vugja Lungpa, Ngari Ngagchang
Konchok Lhundup, Palri Tulku and two groups of practitioners of Phende
Legshe Ling (Namgyal Dratsang) performed a ritual fire offering and
burnt the interfering spirit. This is the declaration I have written at
that time:
To the deities, Legden, Chagdrug, Leshin and Magzor,
To the oath bound protectors Gongzhi, Gonpo, Chamsre and Begtse, etc.
Who have been propitiated and whose practice (has been done) I offer this sublime libation.
The so-called Drakpa Gyaltsen pretends to be a sublime being, even though he is not,
And since this interfering spirit and creature of distorted prayers
Is harming everything - both the dharma and sentient beings – Do not
support, protect or give him shelter, but grind him to dust.
To the female protectors like Nodjin Yangghaza, etc. and Gyalpo Ku-nga,
Khyabjug, Dorje Leg and particularly Nechung and his entourage
I offer this sublime libation. The so-called Drakpa Gyaltsen pretends to be a sublime being, even though
he is not,
And since this interfering spirit and creature of distorted prayers
Is harming everything - both the dharma and sentient beings -
Do not support, protect or give him shelter, but grind him to dust.
To the seven Barwa brothers like Tse-marpa etc.
The so-called Drakpa Gyaltsen pretends to be a sublime being, even though
he is not,
And since this interfering spirit and creature of distorted prayers
Is harming everything - both the dharma and sentient beings -
Do not support, protect or give him shelter, but grind him to dust.
And likewise Setrab of Sangphu etc.- the wrathful gods and spirits among whom this negative spirit seeks support
I offer this sublime libation. The so-called Drakpa Gyaltsen pretends to be a sublime being, even though
he is not,
And since this interfering spirit and creature of distorted prayers
Is harming everything - both the dharma and sentient beings -
Do not support, protect or give him shelter, but grind him to dust.
Having agreed before the root and lineage lama Vajra Dharas
To increase what is good and beneficial to sentient beings and the dharma,
If you protect this perfidious spirit, Will you not cause your own past pledges to degenerate?
There are groups of interfering spirits who display inopportune miracles
In the form of human sickness, cattle disease, hailstorms, famine and
drought.
May their power and ability
Their body, speech and mind be smashed into tiny particles.
So, this is the declaration issued by the fifth Dalai Lama. It is quite strongly worded.
Next, is the Sangwa Gyachen, which is also the secret autobiography of
the fifth Dalai Lama and is included in the Kagyama section of the
fifth Dalai Lama’s Collected Works. A printed edition of the Tsapoe was
eventually published in Delhi in 1972 by the Ladakhi doctor Sonam
Wangdu. In the Pure Visions section of the Fifth Dalai Lama’s Sangwa
Gyachen there are twenty-five sub-sections. Among them, in the Vase
Gyachen, we find the following:
As I was listening to these words, the great Acharya, holding a
Khatvanga in his right hand and with his left hand in a threatening
gesture, flanked by two dakinis, spoke as follows:
There is no difference between me and Avalokiteshvara
Without
involving in too much chatter
Put into practice what I showed you
earlier
In order to dispel obstacles, perform the dispelling ritual of
the White Umbrella deity and Charka and the previously described
Lukdril.
(H.H.- From this point on it is written in the cursive
(Trukyig) script. It goes like this.) A fire ritual was
performed at the site of the Upper Palace in Drepung. H.H.- this
indicates that there was some problem with the Upper Palace. This is
what we find in the Vase Gyachen. Again, in another division of the
Sangwang Gyachen called the Drithue Gyachen, we find the following:
On
the first day of the female Earth- Bird year, at Drepung, a black woman
the size of a mountain placed her right foot on the Upper Palace, and
her left foot on the Choekorling at Drepung. There was a haze of dust.
This also shows that the Upper Palace was marked by controversy.
Therefore, the claim by Dholgyal practitioners that there exists a
prayer propitiating Shugden composed by the Fifth Dalai Lama is
unlikely to be true. Even if it were considered to have been written by
the Fifth Dalai Lama, it must have been written during the initial
period (of this affair) when he has stated himself that he tried
skilfully to employ peaceful methods. Nevertheless, while we may accept
(the assertion that he did write such a prayer) as true, usually when
we are confronted with a situation in which we have to decide which of
two options is correct - for example, between a statement made by the
Buddha earlier in his life and another that was made later- according
to the Vinaya, the later statement is considered more reliable than the
former. So, the later a statement was made the more importance is
attributed to it. Therefore, even if we accept that the propitiation
prayer does belong to the Fifth Dalai Lama, what he said distinctly,
clearly and emphatically during the later stages of his life must be
considered as of overriding importance. So, this has concerned the
involvement of the Fifth Dalai Lama.
Next, the collected works of
Thukhen Lobsang Choekyi Nyima (1737-1802) contain a biography of
Changkya Rolpai Dorje (17 17-86). The biography describes how Changkya
Rolpai Dorje travelled to Lhasa from Amdo. It reads as follows:
One
day, he (Changkya Rolpai Dorje) went out to make a circumambulation of
the monastery (H.H.- this is at Ganden) and as he reached the right
corner of the mountain behind Ganden he became aware of the smell of a
great (column) incense smoke rising from the village that lay down
below on the floor of the valley. He asked, “What is the name of that
village?” Someone familiar with the area told him, “It’s called
Thagye.” (“Tha” means edge and “Gye” means expand. So, together, it
means “the edge expands.”) He responded, “That is an auspicious sign”
and seemed to be very pleased. This, I (Thukhen Lobsang Choekyi Nyima)
think is an extremely good sign that due to the grace and kindness of
Je Lama himself (Changkya Rolpai Done) the tradition of Gyalwa
Tsongkhapa will spread and flourish in all places, at all times.
Then,
as he continued his circumambulation, a tantric Geshe accompanying him
explained the stories associated with each and every one of the many
naturally formed stone images of deities, mantras, and hand and foot
imprints on stones that were lying above and below on the sides of the
road. In particular, he was shown a stone on which there was a very
clear image of Tsongkhapa, which was said to have formed during the
time of the Seventh Dalai Lama.
[H.H.-I don’t remember this. Do any of
you know about this? An image of Tsongkhapa, which was said to have
appeared during the time of the Seventh Dalai Lama. Which direction is
it in? The direction from which the Thirteenth Dalai Lama extracted
Tsongkhapa’s hat from its treasury is in the East.]
Then they sighted a
footprint, which was not attributed to anyone in particular. At that
point, Je Lama (Changkya Rolpai Dorje) jokingly said, “this foot print
probably belongs to a Nyingmapa. So, those of you who are followers of
Phurbuchock had better avoid it. At that point,
Thukhen Rinpoche said,
if a Nyingmapa is able to leave his footprint at the seat of Je
Tsongkhapa, then I should also be able to leave a foot print on the
jewelled ground of Sukhavati. That made everybody burst into laughter.
[He just boasted a little as a joke.]
Later, when they looked into it,
they found that there was a saying that the footprint belonged to
Khonton.
[H.H - Do any of you know about
this?]
Then he went to the place where Machen was propitiated. Since, Je Lama
(Tsongkhapa) and his disciples didn’t propitiate worldly spirits, even
the spirit belonging to Je Lama’s (Tsongkhapa’s) own birthplace was not
given a place within the circumambulatory limits.
[H.H. - What I want to
say starts from here.]
Previously, some Ganden Throne holders
propitiated Dholgyal and inauspicious events took place. Consequently,
Trichen Dorje Chang (Trichen Ngawang Chokdhen 1677-1751) (here it very
clearly states that the spirit was Dholgyal destroyed the images and so
forth of him and banished him from the premises of the monastery. Then,
he went to Lambar and Lhasa and repeatedly said, “This time I went to
Ganden and was able to do something extraordinary”.
This is what
appears in the biography of Changkya Rolpai Dorje, composed by Thukhen
Rinpoche.
Trichen Ngawang Chokdhen was the root guru of the 7th Dalai
Lama and an extremely great being. He was from Amdo, so we are from the
same region of Tibet, and became the first Reting Rinpoche. He was
really an incredibly great being. It was he who was responsible for
making Gyalchog Kalsang Gyatso what he was. These two, both Lama and
disciple, had great devotion for each other. I am moved to tears,
particularly when I reach the point in Gyalchog Kalsang (Gyatso’s)
biography where Trichen Rinpoche says he doesn’t want anything except
Reting. When the time came for him to leave for Reting, Gyalchog
Kalsang requested him to stay a little longer. But, Trichen Rinpoche
says, “Now, I will go”. Then Trichen Rinpoche mounts his horse and sets
off. According to past accounts, there was a place in the Potala called
the Wanglatang. That’s where Trichen Rinpoche left from and as he began
his descent, Gyalchok Kalsang watched after him from the window of
Wanglatang. It is really moving, because they both wept.
Anyway, I have
been wondering what we might find in Trichen Ngawang Chokdhen’s
biography. There is one by Changkya Rolpai Dorje. At first I thought
there must be a biography of Trichen Ngawang Chogdhen by Gyalchog
Kalsang as Trichen was his root lama, but there isn’t. He probably
didn’t have time to write one. However, he instructed Changkya Rolpai
Dorje to write Trichen’s biography instead. So, this is what we find on
page 67 of the biography of Trichen Ngawang Chokdhen composed by
Changkya:
Previously, a very vicious and evil spirit (it is not
specifically stated that the spirit is Dholgyal, but it is clear from
Changkya’s biography that the spirit referred to is Dholgyal. It also
refers to the time when Trichen Ngawang Chokdhen was the Ganden
Throne-holder,) possessed a man at Draksep. Some unstable lamas, former
abbots, and monastic hostels (khangtsens) did practice in relation to
it simply by invoking and propitiating it. A cairn for invoking spirits
had also been erected on top of the Iangtse mountain. Considering how
inappropriate was this turn of events he issued an edict to the
assembly of monks that as there had been no tradition of propitiating
worldly spirits and protectors within the premises of this seat of
learning since the time of Je Tsongkhapa, henceforth, nobody would be
allowed to engage in such activities. The cairn was demolished (this is
very clearly stated in the biography of Changkya) and the stones and
earth were returned to the places from which they had been taken. The
spirit was invoked through a medium in trance and was then ordered not
to come through such trances henceforth. Dholgyal replied, “If this is
the order of Tri Rinpoche, I have no choice but to leave.” Then, the
ghostly spirit fled to Taktse Shol. Je (Trichen Ngawang Chokdhen)
himself went into retreat. He made it a rule that the prayer to
Dharmaraja composed by the Omniscient Gedun Gyatso (the second Dalai
Lama), should be said in the Main Hall of Ganden. Due to Dharmaraja’s
wrath the Lamas and former abbots who had been propitiating the spirit
were killed and the monastic hostels also suffered many misfortunes.
Consequently, such misdeeds entirely ceased and the action that had
been taken became an excellent cause for maintaining the purity of the
monastery.”
This account appears in the biography of Trichen (Ngawang
Chokdhen) composed by Changkya Rolpai Dorje, which can be found among
Changkya’s Collected Works. It is clearly stated below that this
account refers to Dholgyal. However, here it just refers to the Gyen
gong (ghostly spirit). The text’s reference to the activities of some
“unstable lamas, former abbots, and monastic hostels (khangtsens)”
prior to Trichen Ngawang Chokdhen’s becoming the Ganden Throne-holder,
is confirmed in the works of Purchok Ngawang Jampa.
This is what we
find in the Catalogue of the Three Monastic Seats composed by Phurchok
Ngawang Tampa:
Thus, at the time when Je (Tsongkhapa) himself was
alive, apart from those dharma protectors who are bound by oath and are
mentioned in the tantras themselves, no objects for propitiating or
seeking the slightest help of harmful negative worldly spirits who are
ghosts, was ever installed within the premises of this monastic seat.
As a result, all the members of the community, both Lamas and disciples
lived in harmony and the tradition of study and practice flourished.
Even (the cairn) to the spirit of Tsongkhapa’s birthplace was placed
outside the monastery. However, nowadays, many people who consider
themselves to be followers of Tsongkhapa, and who adopt the three robes
of a fully ordained Buddhist monk, go for refuge in ghostly spirits.
They will have to face the consequence of meeting with great
misfortune.”
This account is a very clear. We can compare how things
developed later with how they were in the beginning. When Phurchok
Ngawang Tampa prepared his Catalogue of the Three Monastic Seats, he
describes how things were previously. When Tsongkhapa was alive there
was no occasion for the propitiation of worldly spirits whatsoever.
However, he complains, for some time since then, even in this monastery
(Ganden), some people, who claim to be followers of Tsongkhapa and who
wear the three robes of a fully ordained Buddhist monk, go for refuge
in ghosts. As a result, even though there was previously great harmony
and purity at Ganden, later because of such activities, many
inauspicious events have occurred. This is what Phurchok Ngawang Jampa
clearly explained.
Subsequently, when Trichen Ngawang Chokdhen became
the Ganden Throne-holder, because Phurchok Ngawang Jampa was not on the
throne, he had no authority and was unable to do anything more that
criticise. However, both he and Trichen Ngawang Chokdhen were from Sera
Te, as you all know. Trichen Ngawang Chokdhen records that when he came
to Lhasa from Amdo, Phurchok Ngawang Jampa was known as the Lhopa
Khampa, renowned as one of the top students in dialectics. This is
recorded in Trichen Ngawang Chokdhen’s biography. Later, they became
guru and disciple, but from the point of view of age, they were
contemporaries. That is why it is very likely that when they
occasionally met Phurchok Ngawang Tampa would have raised this issue
with Trichen Rinpoche.
As far as Phurchok Ngawang Jampa was concerned, as he was not the
Ganden Throne-holder, there was nothing he could do except complain.
Whereas, Trichen Ngawang Chokdhen, who was both the Ganden
Throne-holder, and the tutor of the seventh Dalai Lama, used his
authority to prohibit the practice of propitiating negative worldly
spirits and ordered the destruction of the temples for propitiating
such spirits.
Moreover, the words of the text quite clearly show that Tri-Rinpoche,
by invoking Choegyal (Dharmaraja), virtually killed those who had
misbehaved. That this all refers to Dholgyal can be established by the
passages found in Changkya Rolpai Dorje’s text. This is why the
statements in the letters of enquiry sent by the previous Dalai Lama to
Kyabje Phabongkha Rinpoche, stating that ‘physically putting on the
three robes and then taking refuge in ghostly spirits is not correct”,
turns out to be absolutely accurate. These things were not written by
me, nor do they only appear in new editions, they appear in editions
that were produced in Tibet.
During the past sixty years the practice of Dholgyal became very
widespread. Kyabje Phabongkha Rinpoche was really an incredibly great
master. As I always say, he is virtually the supreme holder of the
Stages of the Path (Lam rim) and Mind Training (Lo jong) traditions.
But with regard to Dholgyal he seems to have made mistakes. Rinpoche
himself was a highly realized being. He was capable of enthralling
anything - human or non-human - at will and so call on their
assistance. That is quite possible, but it is a different matter (from
seeking ordinary assistance). Trijang Rinpoche was also an exception.
However, it is a great and dangerous mistake for those following them
simply to imitate what these lamas did. Although Dragyab Tokden
Rinpoche was an incalculably great master of the Stages of the Path,
following Phabongkha’s visit to different areas of Kham, he went too
far with regard to the Dholgyal Practice. As a result, many
difficulties connected with religious sectarianism arose in Kham.
Likewise, many controversial incidents took place in parts of Utsang
and Lhoka, which even today many older even can clearly recount.
Evidence of this can be glimpsed in the writings of the Amdo scholar
and lama, Tseten Shabdrug. There is one part where he tells the story
of his root lama Alak Jigme Damchoe. The text was printed in book form
in Tibet. Alak Jigme Damchoe’s two-volume commentary to Tsongkhapa’s
Essence of Eloquent Explanation (Drange Lekshe Nyingpo) is probably the
most extensive commentary on it to date. Therefore, he was an extremely
great scholar. But his greatest contribution was probably his Great
Commentary of figje Tokdun. He himself said that this text was his
greatest achievement and it does indeed look remarkably good. So, this
is what we find in the biography of this great master, composed by
Tseten Shabdrung:
On this occasion, the excellent scholar known as Choekyi Lodroe, the
illuminator of the Nyingma school and the reincarnated tulku of the
incomparable Jamyang Khyentse, [H.H.- Khyentse Choekyi Lodroe was
actually a Sakyapa from Derge, but had trained in all four traditions)
even though I didn’t know him [H.H.- They hadn’t met each other until
then] sent me a gift and an accompanying letter from Derge Menchoe
Dzongsar Gon. The letter reads:
‘When I heard about you, I felt great joy. I thought that I probably
have a connection with you from past lives. Much as I wish to meet you
in person I am (unable to because I am) by the force of karma sick and
am at a very distant place. So, there is nothing I can do, although I
continue to offer prayers (that we might meet) in my mind. Some of the
followers of Ven. Phabongkha Dechen Nyingpo Rinpoche engaged in heated
argument over the systems of philosophical tenets of the New and the
Ancient traditions. They engaged in many mistaken activities such as
destroying images of Padmasambhava and other peaceful and wrathful
deities. They said that reciting the mantra of the Vajra Guru is of no
value and would destroy the Padma Kathang (by burning it or throwing it
into rivers.) Similarly, they asserted that turning Mani prayer wheels,
observing weekly prayers for the deceased, and so forth are of no
purpose and so placed many on the path of wrong view.
They held Gyalpo Shugden as the supreme refuge and the embodiment of all the Three Jewels.
[This does not mean that he himself held Shugden as the embodiment of
all Three Jewels. Rather, he is critically reporting what these people
are doing. Generally in Sakya tradition Gyalpo Shugden is depicted as
riding a horse. So, it is classed among the spirits (Tsen) and isn’t
regarded as if it is the embodiment of all three objects of refuge.]
Many monks from minor monasteries in Southern area, claiming to be
possessed by Shugden, ran madly in all directions destroying the three
symbols of enlightenment (images, scriptures and stupas) and so forth.
Displaying many such faults they greatly harmed the teachings of the
Second Conqueror, Je Tsongkhapa. Therefore, if you were to compose an
advisory letter for everyone’s benefit and were to publish it and
distribute it throughout the three (provinces) U, Tsang and Kham, it
would greatly contribute to counteracting such disturbances to the
teaching.”For myself, I request you please to send me a copy of the Tokdun Tantric commentary. Thank You.
The manner in which this request was made is evidence that the many
matchlessly renowned great masters of the central and bordering regions
of Tibet, who assert themselves as upholding all four schools of Buddha
Dharma without discrimination, through the ripples of the white wave of
expertise, conduct and kindness, all feel humbled and subdued before
the one who wears the golden coloured crown and takes great
responsibility (for the doctrine).
These are what some of the historical accounts have to say. However, it
sometimes, seems that some of the Gelugpa Dharma holders have been
slightly excessive in their views. For instance, a couple of days ago
we found Aku Sherab Gyatso saying, “The way Je Rinpoche presents the
reality of the basis, the nature of the path, and the way the fruits
are attained in his commentary to the Completion Stage, and his method
of making divisions are so brilliantly wonderful that some Nyingmapas
have stolen them.”
It doesn’t make any sense to criticise their having understood them. It
is not that the Nyingmapas are not allowed to understand the wisdom of
Tsongkhapa. This is wrong. Our attitude should accord with the
statement, “those wishing to accomplish the benefit of sentient beings
engage in understanding the paths of all three vehicles.” Otherwise, it
is as if they are suggesting, “May the remarkable teachings of
Tsongkhapa not be understood by the Nyingmapas, may they be hidden from
them.” Therefore, sometimes it is possible to go to excess.
However, sometimes political considerations may have a bearing on the
situation. For example, accounts of Kunkyen Lama (Jamyang Shepa,
1648-172 1, of Labrang Tashi Kyil) explain that one day an Amdo lama
came to see Kunkyen Lama Jamshe Ngawang Tsondrue in the hope of
receiving a commentary to some text from him. It says, “that day Gyalpo
Lhasang (Lhasang Khan, leader of the Dzungar Mongols) was there also
and so there was much activity and he was not able to get the
teaching.” Kunkyen Lama Jamshe Ngawang Tsondrue was a disciple of the
Fifth Dalai Lama, who was preceptor at Jamyang Shepa’s full ordination
as a monk. There is hardly any text by Kunkyen Lama in which he does
not pay homage to the victorious father and son. In his text on the
Middle View or in his Great Text on Tenets he says something like this:
“If you think over and over again of the way
in which the Lotus Holder upholds the Dharma,
it moves the very hairs on your heart.
He expresses fulsome praise for the Fifth Dalai Lama, not for the sake
of flattery or to observe etiquette, but out of deep faith. (In his
turn) the Fifth Dalai Lama had probably given predictions and
instructions with regard to the setting up of Tashi Kyil monastery and
the subsequent dissemination of the dharma in Amdo. Likewise, in his
work on the Middle View, when he arrives at the difficult point of
describing identification of the object of negation, (Jamyang Shepa)
quotes statements from the Stages of the Path, Sacred Word of Manjushri
(by the Fifth Dalai Lama) with strong praise for it as a text written
purely from personal experience. Therefore, he placed the Fifth Dalai
Lama upon his head, respecting him as an incredibly great master.
However, it was different when it came to political matters. For
example, he didn’t accept Gyalchog Tsangyang Gyatso as the
reincarnation of the Fifth Dalai Lama.
This is clear from his incredibly good history of Yamantaka. When the
lamas of the lineage are being chronicled, after the Fifth Dalai Lama,
it says, “His reincarnation is the present incumbent Holder of the
Lotus, Ngawang Yeshi Gyatso.” No other Tibetans recognised him. Gyalpo
Lhasang appointed him and Kunkyen Lama Jamyang Shepa recognised him.
So, it is as if only Jamyang Shepa recognised him. All other Tibetan
accounts of the time unanimously refer to Rigzin Tsangyang Gyatso as
the reincarnation of the Fifth Dalai Lama, despite His Holiness having
apparently given back his monk’s vows and his consorting with women.
The generally accepted view of Rigzin Tsangyang Gyatso as being the
reincarnation of the Fifth Dalai Lama went unchallenged, except by
Kunkyen Lama Jamshe Ngawang Tsondrue. That is why for some time the
Shugden organisation have asserted in their letters that His Holiness
the 14th Dalai Lama is very critical of Jamyang Shepa. But this is all
I have said, no more than this.
Now, as a Lama from Loseling College Ling Rinpoche was very partial to
the scriptures written by Panchen Sonam Drakpa. Whereas Gen Nyima used
to prefer the texts of Kunkyen Lama. He would repeatedly say, “Oh, this
text by Jamyang Shepa is so good.” Yongzin Rinpoche would never say
such a thing. (Laughs) For example, (Jamyang Shepa) always says that
the ‘truth of cessation’ is not emptiness, it is ultimate truth, but
not emptiness. Yongzin Rinpoche would emphasise that this is not
possible. Whatever the case, he would not give even a little on the
views expressed by Panchen Sonam Drakpa. He considered them to be like
ultimate truth.
However, at the same time, Yongzin Rinpoche had incredible faith and
respect for Kunkyen Lama Jamyang Shepa. Yongzin Rinpoche was from a
U-Tsang background and belonged to Loseling College, so he had no
particular connection to Amdo. However, he was always full of praise
for Amdo Tashi Kyil, describing it as a treasury of transmissions and
instructions, where every aspect of Je Tsongkhapa’s tantra and sutra
tradition was upheld.
Later, when the Fifth Kunkyen Lama came to Lhasa, when I was small,
Yongzin Rinpoche came into contact with him. On that occasion, the
Kunkyen Lama wanted to establish a branch of the Upper Tantric College
at Tashi Kyil. At that time, Yongzin Rinpoche was probably the Lama
Umze of Gyutoe (the Upper Tantric) College, so, he sent some Gyutoe
monks to Tashi Kyil. Yongzin Rinpoche’s intention was twofold. On the
one hand he wanted to fulfil the wish of Kunkyen Lama Jamyang Shepa and
on the other hand he instructed the monks he despatched to bring back
from Amdo copies of rare texts that could no longer be found in central
Tibet. This was something Rinpoche took particular responsibility for.
In 1955, on my way back from Beijing, I stopped in various parts of
Amdo and I clearly remember the visit I paid to the Tashi Kyil
monastery. I had the good fortune of paying the monastery a visit. At
that time Kunkyen Lama’s reincarnation was very small, and his tutor
was really extraordinary, really incredible. The way he presented the
formal threefold mandala offering was truly extraordinary, really good.
Sadly, the Chinese later killed him during a ‘struggle session’ of
‘thought reform’ (thamzing). He was a truly great being. At that time,
Gungthang Rinpoche was also there. He was about twenty-five years old.
He too was an extraordinary person.
While I was there at Tashi Kyil, I gave an empowerment of Chenrezi.
Yongzin (Ling) Rinpoche told me later that on that occasion, I don’t
remember it myself, they put on the blindfold this way or they used
some initiation substance that way. Such was his respect for Tashi Kyil
that he even paid attention to such minor traditions. Therefore, I too
have unwavering respect for the lineage of Kunkyen Lamas. So, what the
Shugden organisation says about it is really slander. There is no need
for me to convince you or them about this, but, it is important to know
the truth, how things really stand. What Kunkyen Lama has been right
about is right and what he was wrong about is wrong. But, in matters
such as this, I am very clear in my own mind and don’t visualise every
aspect of the Lama as correct.
For example, as we saw Aku Sherab Gyatso said, “Oh, what a pity, what a
pity. This was understood by the Nyingmapas....“, and other such
things. (Laughter) After some time, we might even say, “Oh, what a
pity, if a Nyingmapa attains enlightenment. (Laughter) But even then,
if we say “Oh, what a shame....“, when a Nyingmapa attains
enlightenment, it will not help any Gelugpa attain enlightenment.
Therefore, I tell people that there is no need for what is known as
“seeing everything that the lama does as correct”.
If it were appropriate to see everything the Lama does as correct, then
there would have been no need for the Buddha to explain the
qualifications of a Lama in such great detail. The Buddha himself
wouldn’t have to have undergone austerities for six years. He could
have continued to live as a prince surrounded by many queens and given
teachings to his followers. The reason the Buddha renounced the world,
was ordained as a monk and undertook austerities for six years was to
give us an example. He wanted to show us that in order to purify our
minds, which since beginning less time have been thoroughly defiled by
the three poisonous disturbing emotions, we have to make effort and
have to be able to withstand hardship. Therefore, the Buddha’s teaching
is something, which can withstand investigation. It is not something
incapable of withstanding analysis that depends only on faith.
However, if you become aware of mistakes your lama has made or he has
done things you do not approve of, that does not mean that you should
lose faith. For example, I myself have received considerable teachings
from Reting Dorjechang, and many teachings from Taktra Rinpoche too.
Both of them are my lamas. But (my faith does not extend to) all their
deeds. I am referring to what actually happened. In a letter written in
his own hand Reting Rinpoche approved a plot to take the life of Kyabje
Taktra Rinpoche. I have seen it myself. This is how it happened. A
number of documents were seized and among them were found letters
Reting Rinpoche had written personally to people like Nyungne Lama in
Lhasa. My late abbot himself showed them to me. It was apparent from
these letters that when Nyungne Lama, Kharto Rinpoche and others had
first sought Reting’s approval of their plans, he had repeatedly
counselled and advised them to exercise restraint. But the letters seem
to indicate that, by and by, as if to the perception of ordinary
sentient beings dependent arising had gone wrong, Reting Rinpoche
himself developed a desire to get rid of Taktra Rinpoche. This was
clear from the documents and there is no problem in saying so.
For us Buddhists there is no contradiction here. I don’t feel at all
uncomfortable about saying this. Reting Rinpoche’s hand written letter
says, “Take care that the old monk (referring to Taktra Rinpoche) does
not escape” This is completely wrong. I don’t even try to imagine that
this was correct. Even so, I don’t view these actions as a cause for my
losing faith in him. I have unwavering faith in Reting Rinpoche.
However, mistaken actions such as I recognize as mistakes. I don’t
think of these as the Lama’s so called “inestimable deeds”.
Similarly, with regard to Trijang Rinpoche, I don’t believe his
behaviour in relation to Gyalchen was correct. I don’t visualise it as
divine activity. However, I don’t use it as ground for losing faith in
him either. He was really such an important Lama to me. I received
immeasurable kindness from him even when I was very small. It may seem
a little boastful if I give you this example of my strong faith in
Trijang Rinpoche. I often dream of my lamas, and in one clear dream
Kyabje Rinpoche was urinating and I was lapping it up. So, I do have
single pointed faith in him. But the fact that I have faith in him
doesn’t mean that I should have faith in everything that he did. And
when Kyabje Rinpoche was still alive, I was able to tell him so.
Now, I belong to the line coming from Kyabje Phabongkha, and I hold the
lineage of my two tutors. At the same time, since I sit on the throne
of the Dalai Lama, I have to carry the responsibility of this
institution on my shoulders. From this point of view, I have said
before that even Gyalchog Kalsang Gyatso, the Seventh Dalai Lama was
not fully qualified to sit on the throne of the Dalai Lama. I said this
previously when I gave the Great Stages of Mantra teaching. I wonder if
any of you here remember? This is how it seems to me.
Being fairly forthright person I don’t know how to be courteous and
discreet. However, sometimes I have been able to do it. For example,
when dealing with the Chinese, you have no choice, but to be
conciliatory. I worked with the Chinese for nine years in Tibet. On
those occasions when I met Mao Tsetung I flattered him a little.
Otherwise, my nature is basically frank and open. Therefore, at this
time, it is important that you try to listen and understand the whole
of what I have said. Only then will you get my point. If, on the other
hand, you pick up only one of the many things I have said and black out
the rest, saying, “Gyalwa Rinpoche has broken his guru-disciple
relationship, he is this and that, and Gyalwa Rinpoche is critical of
Jamyang Shepa”, you may not fool many people, but some people will
probably be deceived.
I am just telling you how things stand. Do you understand? Whether we
are talking about Kyabje Phabongkha Rinpoche or Trijang Rinpoche, both
were inestimably great masters. However, some of their deeds came about
as a result of the nature of their disciples and due to their karma and
merit. Therefore, since we all have a fundamentally pure bond with each
other, I have explained these things to you in order that you will be
able to feel confident about them. It’s not that I have any personal
wish to speak about them.
Now in connection with these issues, I wanted to tell you some of the
personal experiences I have had, even though there may not be much
meaning in them. Of course, I have given a detailed account, which you
can find in books that have already been published. From time to time I
do have strange dreams. However, I would like to recount several things
that have not been published so far. I have already described elsewhere
the dream I had when I arrived at Ganden, as a result of which the
statue of Dholgyal in the Choegyal chapel had to be removed.
After that, when I was in France some years ago, I had a dream one
night of a white person who was said to be Dholgyal. That white man
seemed to enter into a hollow space under the earth, something like a
house underneath the ground. After he had entered the hole, I closed it
up by completely covering it with earth and then levelled the ground by
stamping on it. Then to one side there was an image of four-armed
Mahakala. It’s faces were quite big, probably life size. Even though it
was a statue, this Mahakala and I started wrestling with each other. As
we fought the four armed Mahakala turned into the two-armed form and it
seemed that I had won. So, it seems as if there is something in this.
Even before that, on another occasion, which related to something to do
with Kyabje Rinpoche, I had a dream that I suspected was probably due
to Dholgyal. There was a thangka of Shel Dramsug in the background.
This too indicated something. It is mentioned in the biography of Tulku
Dakpa Gyaltsen that he had a particular relationship with Shel and it
does seem like there was some connection there. It’s quite strange. So,
this relates to my experiences with Gonpo shel.
On another occasion, some years ago, I gave a talk about Dholgyal to
the staff of the Tibetan administration in Thekchen Choeling. As I was
coming back to my office at the end of the talk, I saw that about ten
pictures of Gonpo Shelshi (all of them photographs of a thangka),
something I have neither seen before nor since, had been brought for
consecration. It was unprecedented then and has not been repeated.
There is a place where all the religious items people bring for
blessing are deposited. On that occasion, after I had finished talking
about Dholgyal, and as I was coming back to the office, I saw amongst
the other items about ten conspicuous pictures of Gonpo Shel. I
thought, “Well, what’s this. This is rather strange’. There was some
rice nearby, so I threw some grains over them and all ten collapsed. I
thought, “Oh, that’s good”. (Laughter)
I have received the full permission to practise all the Mahakalas,
Gonpo Shel Namqyur Chudun. Even as a very small boy I had great faith
in Gonpo Shel and was very fond of him. Since the time of the
Omniscient Gendun Drup (the First Dalai Lama) there has been a special
relation with him and he had become an exclusive protector (of the
Dalai Lamas). I challenge any suggestion that he is somehow crossed
with me or opposed to me over the issue of Dholgyal. I have nothing to
be afraid from Gonpo Shel, there is no reason for me to have to give in
him. (Laughter) So, this is how it is. But this is just a digression.
It seems to me that there is some connection with Shel. But, now that I
have said that, the Dholgyal advocates will probably start invoking him
too. (Laughter) Let them do so. It won’t make any difference to me.
(Laughter) Let me boast a little. Gonpo Shel is not a fool. He will
support me and not them, because I am making a positive contribution to
the Buddha Dharma.
But I feel that if people say nasty things to me, I don’t need to bow
my head, I need to hold it high. If the other person is humble, I also
want to be humble. I think of myself as no more than a beggar, I don’t
have any sense of myself as something special. Even whenever I come
across a beggar, I have a genuine sense of being equal to, if not lower
than, him. I don’t think, “I am something”. But when the other side
acts big without reason, then it’s only right that I should act a bit
tough in return. (Laughter)
That’s why, as I just mentioned, when it is said that (my opponents)
have been doing lots of black magic, I just have to laugh. I don’t do
anything about it, I don’t even visualise the protection wheel. On my
part, I really have true faith in the Buddha dharma and the most
compassionate Buddha. I really have true faith. I told the government
staff that I have a pure refuge in my continuum. When I generate faith
in the precious Dharma, I generate real faith in the precious Buddha.
And I also have genuine faith in the qualified followers of the Buddha.
The statement that if you have pure refuge, you will not be harmed
either by humans or non-humans, is definitive. There is no need to
qualify it as definitive or subject to interpretation or to explain it
through the method of six extremes and four systems, is it?
So, when I hear that people are provoking others to behave negatively
or are behaving negatively themselves, my response is that they will
make their mouths hurt and tire themselves out. I have heard, for
example, that they are blowing the long horn very hard, but I can’t see
much point in that.
So, I was talking about one of my dreams. Later, on another occasion,
we were performing a ritual of Hayagriva. It was not particularly aimed
at Dholgyal. The aim was to destroy anything, be it human, non-human, a
lama, a deity or a ghost. That harms the Dharma and the just cause of
Tibet. Whatever it is, it should be eliminated. It can’t be helped. One
night during the period when we were conducting this ritual, I dreamt
that I was sitting on my bed. Beside my bed was a small boy, about
seven or eight years old, whom I took to be Dholgyal. This boy was
holding my right hand. When I looked again, I saw that where he held my
hand the boy’s fingernails were changing into claws and he was
extending them. I was annoyed, grabbed the child by the neck and
strangled him. My visualisation of myself as Hayagriva and my sense of
divine pride were very clear. While still maintaining this clear vision
and divine pride, I took the child in my hands, rubbed it between my
palms and swallowed it. It was a very clear dream. Then I awoke. And as
I awoke I was still in the process of swallowing. The thought went
through my mind, “Strange, how could something the size of a small boy
squeeze down my throat”. (Laughter) That was because my ordinary
perception had begun to arise again. Previously I had been experiencing
clear vision and divine pride, but immediately on awakening, ordinary
preconceptions arose again. Consequently, I asked myself, “How could
this happen?” So, this was another incident.
Then, last year, we went to Drepung and stayed there for two or three
days. After that I stayed at Ganden for one or two days. Isn’t that
right? So, it was during that time, on the night of my arrival at
Ganden, that I had a dream of somewhere like Dungkar monastery in
Dromo. Generally, whenever I have dreams connected to Dholgyal, I dream
of Dungkar monastery. I think that’s because I first encountered him
Dungkar monastery. It seemed like Dungkar monastery and I thought it
was Dungkar monastery. But in appearance it wasn’t actually Dungkar
monastery. There was a huge hall. I was on the middle floor. There was
also a huge wall. And in order to go down to the hall from the middle
floor you had climb down a ladder.
As I went down the ladder, there were people on either side whose flesh
and blood had completely dried up, just like the lumps of dried meat
(thukpai dhor) half infested by worms, which we put in the thukpa at
the time of the Great Prayer Festival in the Tsuglagkhang in Lhasa. In
the past, there used to be a meat shop at the Tsuklagkhang, behind what
was known as the Simchung Labrang. I used to watch what was going on
down there and I have seen the chunks of meat on display. It was all
dried meat. There was no red meat, it was all completely dried out and
yellow looking. So, it was as if these people had only their skins
left, which looked very like the dried meat served during the Great
Prayer Festival. They looked so miserable. They were cutting pieces of
dry flesh off their bodies with a knife and eating them. Then, on the
floor of the hall, there was a huge thangka of Gyalchen laid out.
These people looked so appalling. I felt very distressed and disturbed,
and wondered, “How can I help them?” but there was nothing much I could
do. Then it occurred to me that it might help them if they heard the
sound of ‘Manis’ in their ears, With strong compassion I recited “Om
Mani Padme Hum” about three times, after which I woke up. At the same
time, as I passed down between these emaciated people, I became aware
of a strong, very strange smell. A long time ago I dreamt of Kyabje
Zemey Rinpoche and in that dream I smelled the same smell. That was
twenty years ago. The two smells were just the same. Although id didn’t
recognise this while I was actually dreaming, as soon as I woke up I
realised that the two smells were the same. So, there was something
strange going on there. These are just instances from my personal
experience, so there’s nothing reliable about them. However, I
sometimes wonder if some of them don’t have some significance. Anyway,
I have simply told you about them.
Now, another thing that I have talked about before, and which you can
read about in the books that we have put out, is how to approach
practice in relation to worldly spirits (arrogant ones) Regardless of
what (the nature or status) of a particular deity is in definitive
terms, if it manifests as a worldly spirit, it must be dealt with care.
The way to relate to it and the meaning of a worldly spirit’s ‘life
entrustment’ (srog-gtad) is that the worldly spirit puts its life at
the yogi’s command and the yogi controls the worldly spirit. It is not
that the yogi put his life at the command of the worldly spirit. Look
at how Gyalchen practitioners behave these days. They say, “I have
received the ‘life entrustment’ “and act like as if they have given
their entire body, speech and mind over to a worldly spirit. They say
with great fear, “If I break (my commitment to perform) the monthly
propitiation ceremony to him, he will harm me.” They have got things
totally out of perspective.
First of all you have to reach a confident state of realisation. I told
Trijang Rinpoche this last year. There is no need (for him) to be hasty
at the moment. First, Rinpoche should study the scriptures well and
from time to time, he should do authentic retreats. Dholgyal is
something with whom Rinpoche has a connection from past lives, and when
the time comes, when Rinpoche’s personal realization reaches maturity,
I will decide through ‘dough-ball’ divination whether he should take up
the practice. And if the divination indicates that Rinpoche should do
the practice, then, if Rinpoche has acquired a degree of inner
confidence and realisation, it will be perfectly all right. But there
really is no hurry. So, this is how you should proceed. This is what
qualified practitioners do. For example, it doesn’t look as if the
Sakya lamas have submitted themselves to Dholgyal.
By the way, Kalu Rinpoche once told me a story. He had gone on
pilgrimage to Sakya. As he visited the Protector Chapels at Sakya, one
by one, the caretaker who was showing him round, rather casually
explained the stories of the chapels and the images they contained.
However, when they reached the entrance of one chapel the caretaker
removed his shoes, made three prostrations and with great reverence,
explained the story associated with it. It turned out that the chapel
belonged to Dholgyal. So, it seems that that Sakya caretaker also
regarded Dholgyal as holier than the Buddha. What a caretaker? But he
was only doing what we all do. Usually, when we see a statue of the
Buddha, all we feel and say is “I go for refuge to you”, that’s all. We
don’t think, “the Buddha might disturb my dreams” or “the Buddha might
harm me” or “do something to me”. On the other hand if we see a deity
snarling with bared fangs, and if the chapel is dark, or there are
paintings of an entire human skin with its four limbs and head spread
out, we feel, “Oh, this might harm me.” We are afraid, thinking, “If I
don’t act respectfully it might harm me.”
We shouldn’t do this, it’s foolish. As Buddhists we should not do such
things. Should we? Who should we be afraid of? We should be afraid of
(offending) the Buddha. Who should we turn to for refuge? We should
seek refuge in the Buddha. He is the one we weep before. (His Holiness
weeps) The Buddha is really great. Incredible. Apart from him, whom can
we rely upon?
Je Rinpoche was someone who practised the sevenfold deities and dharmas
of the Kadampa tradition. He added the three deities, Guhyasamaja,
Chakrasamvara and Yamantaka to Atisha’s Stages of the Path. It’s very
good if we can do that too. It’s the right thing to do. Je Rinpoche saw
that it was important and introduced the tradition. So, it must be
right. Since, Tsongkhapa approved it, it must be right. Yes, of course.
And with regard to protectors, he appointed Mahakala and Dharmaraja. If
we keep increasing the number of protectors in addition to them, it’s
wrong. There is no need for that. There is a danger of the dharma
becoming distorted. That really would be a shame. Therefore, a real
holder of Tsongkhapa’s tradition should supplement the “Stages of the
Path of the Three Beings” with the practices of the three meditational
deities Guhyasamaja, Chakrasamvara and Yamantaka. And if you really
feel you need a dharma protector you can take the Six Arm Mahakala and
Kalarupa. There is no need for any others besides these two.
Now, in my case, since the time of Gyalwang Gedun Drub, a special
relationship developed with Palden Lhamo. And from the time of Gyalwa
Gedun Gyatso and Sonam Gyatso a special relationship developed with
Nechung due to his connection with Drepung. Even though Gyalwa Rinpoche
(the Dalai Lama) was originally from Tashi Lhunpo, later, after he had
become a Drepung lama he became connected to Nechung. So, it is due to
my connection with the Tibetan Government and my responsibility within
the Tibetan Government that I too maintain this relationship. Simply as
a Buddhist monk and a practitioner of the Kadampa lineage, I wouldn’t
need to do the practice of any deity, not even Palden Lhamo. Would I?
But, this is how things stand.
So, it is only the Buddha whom we should be afraid of offending and
whom we should rely on from the heart. It is as if we think the Buddha
has no power to perform any effective activity. When we recite the
Ornament for Clear Realisation whom do we point to when we recite the
part on the ‘twenty-seven activities’? It is as if these have no effect
at all. If you offer a ““ or a ritual cake, you think you are seeking
the protector’s help. You think that whatever you are doing will be
successful that your business will be successful. How sad. Look at the
state of our sense of refuge. Isn’t it important that we should think
more carefully? Don’t you think so? As followers of the Buddha, and as
followers of this extraordinarily pure new Kadampa tradition,
introduced so remarkable by Je Rinpoche, we should be properly
qualified and worthy of it. When we claim to be followers of the pure
Kadampa tradition, but in practice if we propitiate deities and ghosts
it is totally wrong. This is one reason why I have stopped the practice
of Shugden practice. Another reason is that it is clear that from the
time of the Fifth Dalai Lama this deity was not on good terms with the
Ganden Phodrang government (of Tibet). It had to be stopped for this
reason too.
And the third reason is that it should be possible for all different
schools of tenets in general and in particular the four major schools
of Tibetan Buddhism (Gelug) Sakya, Kagyu, and Nyingma - to be
incorporated into the spiritual practice of a single individual. This
would really be a remarkable thing, a tribute to the glory and beauty
of the dharma. This is something I am striving to achieve. Let me tell
you a story. Previously, when the late Kunu Lama Tenzin Gyaltsen was
alive, I once consulted Yongzin (Ling) Rinpoche (about the fact) that
the Kunu Lama Rinpoche possessed the transmission of the Essence of
Secret Tantra (Gyu Sangwang Nyingpo). I said, “I am wondering whether
or not I should receive this transmission from him”. His answer was
that it was probably better for the time being if I were to defer it.
“It wouldn’t be so good” he said. Yongzin Rinpoche was concerned that
if I received such Nyingma teachings, Dholgyal might harm me.
(Laughter) There were such strong preconceptions at that time. Later,
when the Dholgyal issue had blown up …
Now, let me tell you a little about Yongzin (Ling) Rinpoche. Until I
started restricting the practice of Dholgyal, he never said anything to
me about it. He remained silent and very cautious. Once I started
restricting it, Yongzin Rinpoche said, “Yes, you have done the right
thing”. In his own case he told me that, usually, whenever he asked
Kyabje Phabongkha Rinpoche questions on different topics, whatever
answer he received, he always felt from the depth of his heart, “Of
course, this is really the only truth, of course,” as if the answer had
come from the Buddha’s own lips. He had complete conviction. Then, one
day, Yongzin Rinpoche asked Kyabje Phabongkha Rinpoche about Dholgyal.
He reported that it was being said that those who had a relationship
with Nechung should not maintain a relationship with Dholgyal, because
it is said that Nechung and Dholgyal are not on good terms. He asked
what the truth might be.