Washington, DC, USA, 21 October 2007 (By The Dalai Lama, The Washington Post) - Brute force can never subdue the basic human desire for freedom.  The  thousands of people who marched in the cities of Eastern Europe in recent decades, the unwavering determination of the people in my homeland of Tibet and the recent demonstrations in Burma are powerful reminders of this truth.  Freedom is the very source of creativity and human development.  It is not enough, as communist systems assumed, to provide people with food, shelter and clothing.  If we have these things but lack the precious air of liberty to sustain our deeper nature, we remain only half human.

 

In the past, oppressed peoples often resorted to violence in their struggle to be free.  But visionaries like Mahatma Gandhi and the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. have shown us that successful changes can be brought about nonviolently.  I believe that, at the basic human level, most of us wish to be peaceful.  Deep down, we desire constructive, fruitful growth and dislike destruction.

Many people today agree that we need to reduce violence in our society.  If we are truly serious about this, we need to deal with the roots of violence, particularly those that exist within each of us.  We need to embrace "inner disarmament," reducing our own emotions of suspicion, hatred and hostility toward our brothers and sisters.

Furthermore, we need to reexamine how we relate to the very question of the use of violence in today's profoundly interconnected world.  One may sometimes feel that one can solve a problem quickly with force, but such success is often achieved at the expense of the rights and welfare of others.  One problem may have been solved, but the seed of another is planted, thus opening a new chapter in a cycle of violence and counter-violence.

From the Velvet Revolution in Czechoslovakia to the popular pro-democracy movement in the Philippines, the world has seen how nonviolent approach can lead to positive political changes.  But the genuine practice of nonviolence is still at an experimental stage.  If this experiment succeeds, it can open the way to a far more peaceful world.  We need to embrace a more realistic approach to dealing with human conflicts, an approach that is in tune with a new reality of heavy interdependence in which the old concepts of "we" and "they" are no longer relevant.  The very idea of total victory for one's own side and the total defeat of one's enemy is untenable.  In violent conflicts, the innocent are often the first casualties, as the war in Iraq and the Darfur crisis painfully remind us.   Today, the only viable solution to human conflicts will come through dialogue and reconciliation based on the spirit of compromise.

Many of the problems we confront today are our own creation.  I believe that one of the root causes of these manmade problems is the inability of human beings to control their agitated minds and hearts -- an area in which the teachings of the world's great religions have much to offer.

A scientist from Chile once told me that it is inappropriate for a scientist to be attached toward his particular field of study, since that would undermine his objectivity.  I am a Buddhist practitioner, but if I mix up my devotion for Buddhism with an attachment to it, my mind will be biased toward it.  A biased mind never sees the complete picture, and any action that results from such a state of mind will not be in tune with reality.  If religious practitioners can heed this scientist's advice and refrain from being attached to their own faith tradition, it could prevent the growth of fundamentalism.  It can also enable such followers to genuinely respect faith traditions other than their own.  I often say that while one can adhere to the principle of "one truth, one religion" at the level of one's personal faith, we should embrace at the same time the principle of "many truths, many religions" in the context of wider society.  I see no contradiction between these two.

I do not mean to suggest that religion is indispensable to a sound ethical way of life, or for that matter to genuine happiness.  In the end, whether one is a believer or a nonbeliever, what matters is that one be a good, kind and a warm-hearted human being.  A deep sense of caring for others, based on a profound sense of interconnection, is the essence of the teachings of all great religions of the world.  In my travels, I always take the promotion of basic human qualities of goodness -- the need for and appreciation of the value of love, our natural capacity for compassion and the need for genuine fellow feeling -- to be my foremost mission.  No matter how new the face or how different the dress and behavior, there is no significant division between us and other people.

When I first saw a photograph of our Earth from outer space, it brought home powerfully to me how small and fragile the planet is and how petty our squabbles are.  In the midst of our perceived differences, we tend to forget how the world's different religions, ideologies and political systems were meant to serve human beings, not to destroy them.  When I traveled to the former Soviet Union in the late 1970s, I encountered widespread paranoia, even among ordinary people who feared that the West hated them so much that it was ready to invade their country.  Of course, I knew this was mere projection.

Today, more than ever, we need to make this fundamental recognition of the basic oneness of humanity the foundation of our perspective on the world and its challenges.  From the dangerous rate of global warming to the widening gap between rich and poor, from the rise of global terrorism to regional conflicts, what we need is a fundamental shift in our attitudes and our consciousness -- a wider, holistic outlook.

As a society, we need to shift our basic attitude on how we educate our younger generation.  Something is fundamentally lacking in our modern education when it comes to educating the human heart.  As people begin to explore this important question, it is my hope we will be able to redress the current imbalance between the development of our brains and the development of our hearts.

To promote greater compassion in human society, we need to pay special attention to the role of women.  Given that mothers carry the fetus for months within their own body, from the biological point of view, women in general may possess greater sensitivity of heart and capacity for empathy.  My first teacher of love and compassion was my own mother, who provided me with maximum love.  By speaking of mothers' role in teaching compassion, I do not mean to reinforce in any way the traditional view that women's place is confined to the home.  I believe that the time has come for women to take more active roles in all domains of human society, in an age where education and the capacities of the mind, not physical strength, define leadership.  This could help create a more equitable and compassionate society.

In general, I feel optimistic about the future.  As late as the 1950s and '60s, people believed that war was an inevitable condition of mankind and that conflicts must be solved through the use of force.  Today, despite ongoing conflicts and the threat of terror, most people are genuinely concerned about world peace, far less interested in propounding ideology and far more committed to coexistence.

The rapid changes in our attitude toward the Earth are also a source of hope.  Until recently, we thoughtlessly consumed its resources as if there was no end to them.  Now not only individuals but also governments are seeking a new ecological order.  I often joke that the moon and stars look beautiful, but if any of us tried to live on them, we would be miserable.  This blue planet of ours is the most delightful habitat we know.  Its life is our life, its future our future.  Now Mother Nature is telling us to cooperate.  In the face of such global problems as the greenhouse effect and the deterioration of the ozone layer, individual organizations and single nations are helpless.  Our mother is teaching us a lesson in universal responsibility.

The 20th century became a century of bloodshed; despite its faltering start, the 21st could become a century of dialogue, one in which compassion, the seed of nonviolence, will be able to flourish.  But good wishes are not enough.  We must seriously address the urgent question of the proliferation of weapons and make worldwide efforts for greater external disarmament.

Large human movements spring from individual human initiatives.  If you feel that you cannot have much of an effect, the next person may also become discouraged, and a great opportunity will have been lost.  On the other hand, each of us can inspire others simply by working to develop our own altruistic motivations -- and engaging with the world with a compassion-tempered heart and mind.